What does it do?

• Turns a completed answer plan into a fully written first draft ready for Pink Team review
• Expands structured bullets into fluent, confident bid-ready prose that evidences delivery, value, and control
• Embeds guided placeholders (e.g. ‹MISSING EVIDENCE›, ‹NEEDS INPUT›) only where SME input or proof is genuinely missing
• Writes in a future active voice, blending win themes naturally and showing clear evaluator focus throughout

---

When would I use it?

• In the Answer Planning stage — once the logic, structure, and key messages are agreed
• When you need a complete, reviewable draft to test tone, flow, and evidence before Red Team refinement
• For multi-author bids, where a unified writing style and structure are needed across sections
• When the goal is to show evaluators a response that already reads as near-final, not a rough outline

---

How to use it

• Provide the final question, answer plan, and any supporting documents or evidence
• The tool will:
  • Map the plan directly to the question and scoring criteria
  • Expand bullets into coherent paragraphs using the BASE logic (Benefit, Affinity, Solution, Evidence)
  • Write in the future active tense, varying sentence openings and phrasing to avoid repetitive “We will…” constructions
  • Integrate win themes naturally as proof points rather than slogans
  • Embed guided placeholders where data or SME input is missing, giving clear instructions and source hints
  • Keep paragraphs concise (under 120 words) and balanced across sections
  • Cite sources in square brackets (e.g. [sourceName]) for traceability
• Outputs a Pink Team-ready draft with a confident opening, evidence-based body, and assured close

---

Top Tips for best results

• Keep the answer plan’s numbering intact — it’s vital for alignment and review comments
• Review guided placeholders early and brief SMEs on what’s needed to close gaps
• Vary sentence openings and rhythm — use result-first, action-first, and purpose-first phrasing for flow
• Check that every section clearly links to a client benefit, risk control, or measurable outcome
• Treat this draft as 70–80% complete content-wise but 100% structured and evaluable — ready for collaborative refinement, not rewriting